Sipping Science: The challenges of communicating wine microbiomics
Articles
By Capucine Dentraygues and Katherine Rabik -
11 November 2024
Image generated by DALL-E, using the prompt “challenges of communicating wine microbiomics.”
The study of microorganisms and their interactions in the winemaking process—known as wine microbiomics—is an exciting yet complex field of science. Most technological interventions, both in vineyards (e.g. the use of pesticides) and cellars (e.g. the use of additions such as sulphur dioxide), are primarily focused on managing microbial growth¹. As researchers deepen their understanding of interactions between yeasts, bacteria, and fungi, the potential for using natural microbiological processes to respond to major environmental, economic and societal challenges becomes increasingly viable. However, communicating this emerging science to winemakers and consumers poses several challenges, ranging from scientific complexity to cultural resistance and market confusion. This article will examine these challenges in more depth as they will guide our research over the next few years.
Complex science, clear communication
Capturing the scientific complexity of wine microbiomics within communication materials targeted at winemakers or consumers while maintaining accessibility for a non-specialist reader presents a unique challenge. Many winemakers, although experts in their field, may find the vocabulary associated with microbiomics, such as ‘metagenomics’ or ‘microbial consortia’, off-putting. However, oversimplifying research results could also render them useless to winemakers as the intricacies of the new techniques could be lost. Winemaking is highly contextual. Science communication that is either difficult to read or overly simplified and not specific to their region will not be useful to winemakers. ²
On the consumer side, there is a limited understanding of wine sciences, making the wine world challenging to navigate. Effective communication in the wine industry is often based on the emotionalisation of the product, and the introduction of complex terminology or science may cause further confusion. Furthermore, cultural variations among different consumers can lead to varying levels of interest in and understanding of wine sciences, making it complex to convey a clear message while maintaining consistency.
Wines promoting sustainability are gaining popularity and represent a fast-growing category, but most consumers seem already disoriented between different subsets of wine (organic, biodynamic, eco-friendly wines, etc.) 3. This confusion is further reinforced by the perception that wine is inherently ‘natural,’ ⁴ – a view partially due to the historically insufficient labelling information provided to consumers – notably the ingredients added in winemaking (e.g., sulphur dioxide, tartaric acid, carboxymethyl cellulose, etc.).
How can these communication challenges be overcome? Rather than focusing on specific attributes, consumers objectify wine consumption in moderation as part of a healthy and sustainable lifestyle. To find simple cues for the consumer, the communication could centre around the broad concept of ‘natural’ as the exploitation of wine microbiomics aims to support the intrinsic naturalness of wine through farming practices and vinification process while better reflecting its territorial origin and unique taste.⁵ However, there is a big debate around the concept of ‘natural wine’ as there is no official definition nor precise regulation behind it.⁶ Therefore, we must explore alternative approaches to effectively communicate the benefits of wine microbiomics. However, this requires a deeper understanding of the psychological mechanisms that shape consumer preferences toward these types of wine. This will serve as the foundation for creating a simpler, more emotionally engaging approach.
Resistance to change
Another significant challenge in introducing microbiomics to the wine industry is overcoming resistance to change. On one hand, winemaking is steeped in tradition, and many winemakers rely on time-honoured techniques passed down through generations. Their craft is often guided by intuition and a deep connection to the land. While the scientific data provided by microbiomics may be interesting, the technological and experimental nature of this new research can clash with these traditional values.
On the other hand, many growers and winemakers rely on modern technologies such as fungicides and fertilisers in the vineyard and processing aids and additives in the cellar. In some cases, the use of modern technologies prioritises short-term economic gains over sustainable practices. Such practitioners might be concerned about the financial implications of adopting microbiomic approaches, particularly if they are uncertain about the return on their investment.
Convincing grape growers and winemakers to adopt microbiomics-driven approaches likely requires demonstrating tangible benefits, such as greater soil and vine health, enhanced wine complexity, and long-term profitability. But even then, cultural inertia can be difficult to overcome, and the balance between tradition and innovation must be carefully navigated.
Translating research into practical applications
Microbiomic data can show which microorganisms are present at different stages of fermentation, but understanding how to manipulate or harness these microbes to produce consistent results is a different challenge. Some winemakers may question how to use this information to influence wine production predictably. Addressing these questions requires bridging the gap between scientific research and practical winemaking strategies. Previous research has identified ‘perceived usefulness’ as the main driver behind adopting new technologies or processes in winemaking. ⁷ Therefore, communication materials related to wine microbiomics should be framed with practical applications in mind.
Regulatory and ethical concerns
Ethical communication necessitates transparency about the role of microbiomics in wine production. Misrepresenting the science, overselling benefits or conveying unverified claims about the benefits of microbiomics can be considered dishonest, damage consumer trust and result in legal repercussions. It is essential to consider how information may be perceived to ensure that consumers have adequate background knowledge to understand the content, minimising the risk of self-interpretation.
Conclusion
The science of wine microbiomics offers the potential to transform winemaking through the harnessing of natural microbial ecosystems. However, communicating this science presents significant challenges, particularly when it comes to bridging the gap between scientific complexity, industry tradition, and consumer understanding. As we move forward, the key to success will lie in finding clear, accessible ways to share the benefits of microbiomics while respecting the deep-rooted traditions that continue to define the world of wine.
References
[1] Berbegal, C., Spano, G., Tristezza, M., Grieco, F. & Capozzi, V. 2017. Microbial Resources and innovation in the wine production sector. South African Journal of Enology & Viticulture. 38(2):156-166. DOI: 10.21548/38-2-1333
[2] Szymanski, E.A. & Davis, L.S. 2015. Wine science in the Wild West: Information-seeking behaviors and attitudes among Washington state winemakers and growers. Journal of Wine Research. 26(4):270–286. DOI: 10.1080/09571264.2015.1083954
[3]Pullman, M.E., Maloni, M.J. & Dillard, J. 2010. Sustainability practices in food supply chains: How is wine different? Journal of Wine Research. 21(1):35–56. DOI: 10.1080/09571264.2010.495853
[4] Moscovici, D. & Reed, A. 2018. Comparing wine sustainability certifications around the world: History, status and opportunity. Journal of Wine Research. 29(1):1–25. DOI: 10.1080/09571264.2018.1433138
[5] Capitello, R. & Sirieix, L. 2019. Consumers’ perceptions of sustainable wine: An exploratory study in France and Italy. Economies. 7(2):33. DOI: 10.3390/economies7020033
[6] Vigentini, I., Maghradze, D., Petrozziello, M., Bonello, F., Mezzapelle, V., Valdetara, F., Failla, O. & Foschino, R. 2016. Indigenous Georgian wine-associated yeasts and grape cultivars to edit the wine quality in a precision oenology perspective. Frontiers in Microbiology. 7.
[7] Galati, A., Schifani, G., Crescimanno, M. & Migliore, G. 2019. “Natural wine” consumers and interest in label information: An analysis of willingness to pay in a new Italian wine market segment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 227:405–413. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.219
[8] Hill, M., Hathaway, S., Wilkinson, R., Barr, N., Cowey, G., & Krstic, M. 2015. Adoption of grape and wine R&D outputs: Who, what, and why? Final report to Australian Grape and Wine Authority. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources.
[9] Lu, L., Rahman, I. & Chi, C.G.-Q. 2016. Ready to embrace genetically modified wines? The role of knowledge exposure and intrinsic wine attributes. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly. 58(1):23–38. DOI: 10.1177/1938965516629775.
About the authors:
Capucine Dentraygues, with a first Master’s in Wine Management and a second in
Viticulture and Oenology, and Katherine Rabik, with a Master’s in Science
Communication and Public Engagement, are both Doctoral Candidates in the
prestigious Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action, part of the Horizon Europe Doctoral
Network. Their work is funded by the European Union under Grant Agreement
101119480, within the project: “NATURAL MICROBIAL INTERACTIONS IN
WINEMAKING-ASSOCIATED ECOSYSTEMS AS A TOOL TO FOSTER WINE
INNOVATION (Eco2Wine).”
Capucine works with Prof. Dr. Habil Jon Hanf at the Hochschule Geisenheim University in Germany. Within the “Wine Business” work package, her aim is to explore the preferences towards “Natural” and “Biotechnological” wines of consumers with various cultural backgrounds. This will provide a reliable basis for generating target groups and proposing effective marketing strategies. Katherine works with Prof. Marina Joubert at Stellenbosch University in South Africa. Within the “Wine Science Communication” work package, she will be exploring the most effective approaches to creating dialogue around wine microbiomics with different relevant audiences.
Biocontrol in viticulture
Articles
José L. Padilla Agudelo and Elena Palencia Mulero
Introduction
Various strategies have been and are still being explored to manage diseases in viticulture effectively. These include cultural practices, selection of resistant cultivars, chemical control (fungicides and bactericides), and biocontrol. But what do we know about this last strategy, and why is it important for viticulture?
Biocontrol refers to using living organisms, mainly microorganisms called biocontrol agents (BCAs), to manage and reduce pests, diseases, and invasive species. This environmentally friendly approach is an integral part of control strategies and offers an alternative to chemical pesticides, which can negatively affect the environment and human health.1 Different countries’ and regions’ policies aim to reduce synthetic pesticide use and ensure responsible consumption and production, life on land, and clean water.2,3 However, implementing BCAs requires in-depth studies on the complex interactions in plant-microbe-environment interplay.
Among the characteristics of BCAs is their ability to compete effectively for nutrients and space, which are involved in suppressing pathogen growth. They also produce volatile and non-volatile compounds in a process called antibiosis. Finally, BCAs can directly parasitise pathogens. Nowadays, using BCAs with combined approaches (especially those that operate by different mechanisms of action) is useful because it forces a pathogen to overcome several hurdles instead of just one to establish and develop an infection. Additionally, combinations of approaches may have additive or synergic effects.
How can BCAs be useful?
Using BCAs as a preharvest and postharvest treatment to control diseases caused by pathogens has many advantages:
- They can persist on the fruit surface for an extended period.
- They are generally safer for human health than many chemical agents.
- They are eco-friendly.
- They maintain ecological balance and promote biodiversity.
- They can protect the product from reinfection due to their persistent viability.
- They have a lower potential for pathogens to develop resistance.
- Products treated with BCAs potentially open more export opportunities.2
Finding effective BCAs
In the fight for sustainable disease management, finding effective biological control agents within a diverse microbial landscape – bacteria, yeasts and filamentous fungi – is essential but challenging. Vineyards, which host a remarkable diversity of microbial communities, serve as a natural reservoir of potential BCAs. In vitro assays and in vivo studies are crucial in evaluating their inhibitory activity against target pathogens.4
However, this search goes beyond finding a single effective agent. The possibility of combining several BCAs should be explored not only to achieve a greater impact but also to reduce the emergence of new resistances. This raises some interesting questions.
Friends or foes?
How do these BCAs interact with each other and with the target pathogen? Will they work together as a team or hinder? If the target pathogen is successfully eliminated, could others take advantage?
Researchers are figuring this out by studying how BCAs interact with each other, with the target pathogen, the host plant and other microorganisms. By unravelling these complex microbial relationships, they are paving the way for a future where we can assemble the ultimate BCA consortium: a powerful, well-coordinated force for sustainable fungal disease control in the vineyard.
How do you unlock the secrets of BCAs?
The widespread adoption of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques has revolutionised the field of biocontrol. These techniques, which include whole genome sequencing, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics, allow the identification of the molecular pathways and essential genes that play key roles in biocontrol.5
Have any BCAs been approved?
Yes, but despite their growing potential, BCAs currently represent a small fraction (1%) of the agricultural control market compared to the dominance of synthetic pesticides (15%) 6. This limited adoption can be attributed to several factors:
- Efficacy: Sometimes, BCAs may not provide the same level of immediate and predictable disease control as synthetic fungicides.
- Knowledge gap: Commercialising biopesticides often involves proprietary formulations, limiting publicly available information on successful production and application methods.
- Registration and patenting: This can be complex and time-consuming, particularly in certain regions (e.g., Europe).
- Farmer adoption: Financial incentives for farmers to switch from conventional fungicides to BCAs might be limited, especially if they are unaware of and have no experience with this approach. 7
Challenges aside, there is a strong trend to use microbial biocontrol agents for plant disease management. Therefore, research in this field is expected to continue to attract increasing attention, opening new highways toward an environmentally sustainable future.
Fig 1. Flow diagram describing the activities necessary to characterise microbial interactions and produce bioproducts of high biotechnological interest.
References
1. Stenberg JA, Sundh I, Becher PG, et al. When is it biological control? A framework of definitions, mechanisms, and classifications. J Pest Sci (2004). 2021;94(3):665-676. doi:10.1007/s10340-021-01354-7
2. Zhang H, Godana EA, Sui Y, Yang Q, Zhang X, Zhao L. Biological control as an alternative to synthetic fungicides for the management of grey and blue mould diseases of table grapes: a review. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2020;46(4):450-462. doi:10.1080/1040841X.2020.1794793
3. United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals.; 2015.
4. Cordero-Bueso G, Mangieri N, Maghradze D, et al. Wild grape-associated yeasts as promising biocontrol agents against Vitis vinifera fungal pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2017;8(NOV). doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02025
5. Palmieri D, Ianiri G, Del Grosso C, et al. Advances and Perspectives in the Use of Biocontrol Agents against Fungal Plant Diseases. Horticulturae. 2022;8(7). doi:10.3390/horticulturae8070577
6. Lahlali R, Ezrari S, Radouane N, et al. Biological Control of Plant Pathogens: A Global Perspective. Microorganisms. 2022;10(3). doi:10.3390/microorganisms10030596
7. Ayaz M, Li CH, Ali Q, et al. Bacterial and Fungal Biocontrol Agents for Plant Disease Protection: Journey from Lab to Field, Current Status, Challenges, and Global Perspectives. Molecules. 2023;28(18). doi:10.3390/molecules28186735
About the authors:
José L. Padilla Agudelo, with a Master’s in Microbiology, and Elena Palencia Mulero, with a Master’s in Microbiology & Health, are both Doctoral Candidates in the prestigious Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action, part of the Horizon Europe Doctoral Network. Their work is funded by the European Union under Grant Agreement 101119480, within the project: “NATURAL MICROBIAL INTERACTIONS IN WINEMAKING-ASSOCIATED ECOSYSTEMS AS A TOOL TO FOSTER WINE INNOVATION (Eco2Wine).”
José is part of Prof. Gustavo A. Cordero Bueso’s team at the University of Cádiz in Spain, while Elena works with Prof. Ileana Vigentini at the University of Milan in Italy, who also coordinates the Eco2Wine Project. Together, they are diving into the “Grapevine and Grape Biocontrol” Work Package, aiming to uncover and explain the molecular mechanisms behind new biocontrol agents that combat the harmful fungus Botrytis cinerea, a major threat to vineyards.
Main Contacts:
elena.palencia@unimi.it
joseluis.padillaagudelo@alum.uca.es
gustavo.cordero@uca.es
ileana.vigentini@unimi.it
What is a ‘microbiome’, and how does it relate to wine?
What is a ‘microbiome’, and how does it relate to wine?
Karien O’Kennedy
Have you ever wondered what gives your favorite bottle of wine its distinct character? Part of the answer lies in a world invisible to the naked eye but crucially helping to shape the taste and quality of wines: the microbiome.
But hold on, what exactly is a microbiome?
The terms ‘microbiome’ and ‘microbiota’ are often used interchangeably, but they actually refer to different aspects of microbial communities within a particular environment, such as the human body or vineyard soil. Microbiota refers to the collection of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, yeasts and viruses inhabiting a specific ecological niche. It focuses on the organisms themselves rather than their genetic material.
On the other hand, microbiome refers to the collective genetic material of all microorganisms present in a particular environment. It encompasses not only the microorganisms themselves but also their genes and their interactions with each other in their host environment. The microbiome provides a more holistic view of microbial communities, incorporating their genetic diversity and ecological functions.
Microbiomics, the newest kid on the microbiology block, is the science of collectively characterising and quantifying molecules responsible for a microbial community’s structure, function, and dynamics.1 Microbiomics employs multiple techniques, including high-throughput sequencing, bioinformatics, and systems biology approaches, to investigate microbial communities and their interactions with their hosts and environments. The field has broad applications in human health, agriculture, environmental science, biotechnology, and beyond, with implications for understanding disease mechanisms and ecosystem dynamics and developing novel therapies and interventions.
Now, how does this relate to wine?
The vineyard microbiome plays a crucial role in shaping the unique characteristics of wines.2 The microbiome of the vineyard soil, grapevine, and grapes influences the health and growth of the grapevine and the composition of the grapes. The grape microbiome determines the fermentation microbiome (if no commercial yeast inoculation occurs) and the character of what finally ends up in your glass.
Vineyard soils, the foundation of wine character
Soils harbour some of the most diverse microbiomes on earth. Observations from studies suggest that different vineyard soil microbiomes can contribute to variations in grape and wine composition and the wine’s terroir. This happens through the vines’ response to the soil microbiome or through the soil microbiome affecting the grape microbiome and, thus, fermentation.3 An example is an Australian study that demonstrated that distinct differences in the bacterial and fungal communities in different zones within the same vineyard are associated with high and low rotundone concentrations in grape berries. Rotundone is an impact aroma compound with a ‘peppery character’ commonly found in cool climate Shiraz from Australia.
Various abiotic factors, such as geographical origin, climatic conditions, soil composition, and cultivation, can influence the vineyard soil microbiome. Interestingly, biotic factors can also play a significant role, with certain soil fungi that can impose a strong selection on bacteria by producing antimicrobial (antibiotic) compounds.4
Soil health is of utmost importance, not only for viticulture but for all agricultural systems. The soil microbiome forms a critical component of soil health. Understanding how agricultural systems, including viticulture, impact the soil microbiome is crucial to ensuring more sustainable agriculture and food for future generations.
Grapevines, the guardians of wine character
Various factors can influence the microbiome of vines. Vineyard location, farming systems (conventional, organic, biodynamic), viticultural practices and even grape variety are among these factors. A study on Cabernet Sauvignon grapes in four countries with different climates and viticultural traditions using the same experimental layout suggested that grape varieties can have unique microbial fingerprints.2
The different parts of the vine can host various pathogenic and beneficial microorganisms. Beneficial microorganisms can help promote vine health by suppressing the growth of pathogenic organisms and enhancing the plant’s resistance to diseases.5 Studying these interactions can pave the way for eco-friendly biological control of grapevine diseases instead of chemical control. Studying the microbiome in vineyards also holds the potential to improve grapevine adaptation to climate change and boost overall sustainability.
Fermentation, where the magic happens
Microorganisms present on grape surfaces can contribute to the initial stages of fermentation by inoculating grape must with indigenous yeast and bacteria. These native microorganisms initiate spontaneous fermentation, which can influence the chemical composition of the wine, such as its acidity, alcohol content and phenolic profile. Additionally, the microbial communities present during fermentation can lead to the development of complex flavours, aromas and textures in the resulting wine.
Any given species’ contribution to the wine’s final character depends on its numbers and persistence during fermentation. Many factors can influence these two aspects, including interspecies ecological interactions, as shown by South African and Italian researchers.6 Studying the grape juice and fermentation microbiome and the factors that influence it can give winemakers the tools to steer the fermentation in a positive direction for wine quality. It can also help prevent fermentation problems such as stuck fermentations and the formation of off-odours.
Biodiversity for a sustainable future
In the coming decades, the agricultural sector will face major challenges in providing food for a growing world population, but intensive cropping, based on mineral fertilisers and agrochemicals, will continue to impact biodiversity and ecosystems negatively.7 Wine production is no exception to these environmental problems. The study of microorganisms in vineyards and wine production reveals the essential contribution of these invisible communities to the functioning and sustainability of viticultural systems. Microorganisms are vital players in achieving optimal outcomes with diverse influences, from soil health and vine vitality to fermentation and the sensorial profile of a wine. Their complex and symbiotic interaction with the viticultural environment triggers a range of benefits, including the enhancement of final product quality and vineyard resilience against adverse factors. Understanding the factors that impact microbiome distribution and microbial diversity is essential to better harness natural ecosystems for quality wine production.
References
[1] Kumar PS. Microbiomics: Were we all wrong before? Periodontol 2000. 2021;85(1). doi:10.1111/prd.12373
[2] Tronchoni J, Setati ME, Fracassetti D, Valdetara F, Maghradze D, Foschino R, et al. Identifying the Main Drivers in Microbial Diversity for Cabernet Sauvignon Cultivars from Europe to South Africa: Evidence for a Cultivar-Specific Microbial Fingerprint. Journal of Fungi. 2022;8(10). doi:10.3390/jof8101034
[3] Gupta VVSR, Bramley RGV, Greenfield P, Yu J, Herderich MJ. Vineyard soil microbiome composition related to rotundone concentration in Australian cool climate “peppery” Shiraz grapes. Front Microbiol. 2019;10(JULY). doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01607
[4] Bahram M, Hildebrand F, Forslund SK, Anderson JL, Soudzilovskaia NA, Bodegom PM, et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature. 2018;560(7717). doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0386-6
[5] Cobos R, Ibañez A, Diez-Galán A, Calvo-Peña C, Ghoreshizadeh S, Coque JJR. The Grapevine Microbiome to the Rescue: Implications for the Biocontrol of Trunk Diseases. Plants. 2022;11(7). doi:10.3390/plants11070840
[6] Bagheri B, Bauer FF, Cardinali G, Setati ME. Ecological interactions are a primary driver of population dynamics in wine yeast microbiota during fermentation. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61690-z
[7] García-Izquierdo I, Colino-Rabanal VJ, Tamame M, Rodríguez-López F. Microbiota Ecosystem Services in Vineyards and Wine: A Review. Agronomy 2024, Vol 14, Page 131. 2024;14(1):131. doi:10.3390/AGRONOMY14010131
About the author:
Dr Karien O’Kennedy is the Knowledge Transfer Manager for South Africa Wine, an Associated Partner of the Eco2Wine project (https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101119480). She holds an MSc in Microbiology and a PhD in Science and Technology Studies from Stellenbosch University, South Africa. Her areas of expertise include wine microbiology and academic knowledge production, transfer, and uptake.